Townsend v. Mabus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “That the Court’s review of plaintiff’s claims is de novo does not, as plaintiff appears 42 to claim, entitle her to discovery duplicative of that which is already in the record.” (citing Hackley, 520 F.2d at 150)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).