Townsend v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 5105
Syllabus
On written objections to a special master's report and recommendation, the court determined that requester's objections were timely filed, but the objections were not accompanied by a completed proof of service. The court concluded that, even assuming for the sake of argument that requester's objections were not procedurally deficient, requester, an inmate, failed to challenge the special master's finding that requester failed to follow the mandatory procedures set forth in R.C. 149.43(B)(8). The court overruled requester's objections, adopted the special master's report and recommendation, and rendered judgment in favor of respondents.
Judges: McGrath
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.