Townsend v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because Court “was not in ‘actual receipt’ ”, NOA was not timely where received 139 days after mailing of BVA decision even though envelope with improper Court address bore timely postmark and even though appellant relied upon information provided by county veterans’ affairs office in mailing NOA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jaquay v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1998-02-09· cited 13×
• McCracken v. Principi
  Veterans Claims· 2001-02-12· cited 7×
• Baisden v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1998-05-18· cited 5×
• Santoro v. West
  Veterans Claims· 2000-05-30· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 4,144×
• Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
• Lyle H. Prenzler v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 1991-03-20· cited 173×
• Bethea v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1992-03-13· cited 166×
• Skinner v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1990-01-29· cited 97×
• Samuel D. Butler, Jr. v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 1992-03-25· cited 76×
• Robinson v. United States Navy
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 37×
• Shields v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1995-11-02· cited 10×
• Grubbs v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1991-12-23· cited 8×