Townsend v. Benya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that evidence should only be excluded if it is inadmissible on all grounds
• finding a defendant's knowledge of violating a policy was relevant to a Section 1983 claim and therefore was not precluded at trial
• “Rule 411 does not explicitly bar references to indemnification of Defendants”
• “Rule 411 does not explicitly bar references to indemnification of Defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).