Town of Secaucus v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an appellate court’s jurisdiction to consider an appeal depends on whether the appeal is taken in substantial compliance with the applicable rules of appellate procedure
• acknowledging “core separation of powers principle” that prevents courts from claiming authority to allow appeals outside of statutory scheme
• dismissing an application for interlocutory review because appellant failed to obtain a certificate of immediate review from the trial court as required by OCGA § 5- 6-34 (b)
• overruling 22 a decision in which this Court purported to create a judicial exception to the statutory requirements for bringing an interlocutory appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), even though those requirements may sometimes interfere with “the interests of judicial economy”
• unanimously overruling precedent that “created a judicial exception to the statutory requirements for bringing an interlocutory appeal” and recognizing that the “scheme for appellate interlocutory review is legislative in nature”
• “‘The jurisdiction of an appellate court to consider an appeal depends upon whether the appeal is taken in substantial compliance with the rules of appellate procedure prescribing the conditions under which the judgment of the trial court may be considered appealable.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).