Town of Rutland v. City of Rutland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “existence of an agreement is ordinarily a question of fact for the trier”
• explaining that existence of contract “depends on facts as well as the reasonable inferences to be drawn from them, and is also influenced by the situation of the parties and the subject matter”
• affirming trial court’s order on one ground and therefore concluding that this Court need not reach trial court’s second ground
• rejecting defendant's claim that his lawyer, who sought and obtained approval for a public sewer, acted outside the scope of his authority
• rejecting defendant’s claim that his lawyer, who sought and obtained approval for a public sewer, acted outside the scope of his authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).