Town of Huntington v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court may require in camera review to determine whether a disclosure exemption applies
• concluding the relevant standard for whether to conduct in camera review is simply “Whether the district judge believes that in camera inspection is needed in order to make a responsible de novo determination on the claims of exemptions.”
• “In camera inspection requires effort and resources and therefore a court should not resort to it routinely on the theory that ‘it can’t hurt.’ ”
• “In camera inspection requires effort and resources and therefore a court should not resort to it routinely on the theory that ‘it can’t hurt.’”
• \[i]n camera inspection requires effort and resources and therefore a court should not resort to it routinely on the theory that 'it can't hurt '\
• “[T]he executive ha[s] unique insights into what adverse [e]ffects might occur as a result of public disclosure of a particular classified record.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).