Skip to main content
· 8/10/2005

Town of Highland Park v. Iron Crow Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 168 S.W.3d 313
  • 2005 WL 1621581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sue and be sued speaks to an entity's 18 No. 2013AP1023 \capacity to sue and its capacity to be sued when immunity has been waived\
  • if agency had exclusive jurisdiction over dispute, trial court would have lacked jurisdiction to render judgment on arbitration award
  • “Because its contract with Highland Park provided for binding arbitration in the event of a dispute between the parties, Iron Crow was seeking to enforce Highland Park's performance under that contract. Therefore, sovereign immunity was indeed implicated here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whittington, Fitzgerald, Richter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.