· 3/27/1985
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
Citations
- 471 U.S. 34
- 105 S. Ct. 1713
- 85 L. Ed. 2d 24
- 1985 U.S. LEXIS 191
- 53 U.S.L.W. 4418
- 15 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20373
- 23 ERC (BNA) 1544
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that municipal entities, though not sovereign, may avail themselves of the immunity if their actions spring from governing state authority
- recognizing that different state-action test applies based on the status of the defendant
- holding that municipalities need not satisfy the second prong of the Midcal test
- noting that “Municipalities ... are not beyond the reach of the antitrust laws by virtue of their status because they are not themselves sovereign.”
- noting that public entities such as municipalities are exempt from federal antitrust laws if their anticompetitive activities are authorized by state policy meant to displace competition with regulation
- describing New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U. S. 96 (1978
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.