Skip to main content
· 3/27/1985

Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire

Citations

  • 471 U.S. 34
  • 105 S. Ct. 1713
  • 85 L. Ed. 2d 24
  • 1985 U.S. LEXIS 191
  • 53 U.S.L.W. 4418
  • 15 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20373
  • 23 ERC (BNA) 1544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that municipal entities, though not sovereign, may avail themselves of the immunity if their actions spring from governing state authority
  • recognizing that different state-action test applies based on the status of the defendant
  • holding that municipalities need not satisfy the second prong of the Midcal test
  • noting that “Municipalities ... are not beyond the reach of the antitrust laws by virtue of their status because they are not themselves sovereign.”
  • noting that public entities such as municipalities are exempt from federal antitrust laws if their anticompetitive activities are authorized by state policy meant to displace competition with regulation
  • describing New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U. S. 96 (1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.