Town of Gilbert v. Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the remote possibility that any county island might join the class in nineteen years does not satisfy the elasticity requirement
• suggesting that implied-invitation doctrine applies only when activity at issue is unpermitted
• stating that “[r]ipeness is analogous to standing”
• \Ripeness is analogous to standing because the `doctrine prevents a court from rendering a premature judgment or opinion on a situation that may never occur.'\
• “All three prongs of the test must be satisfied in order for the law to be considered general.”
• “All three prongs of the test must be satisfied in order for the law to be considered general.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).