Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a compensable taking occurred when the town conditioned development approval on the developer’s rebuilding and improving of a public street
• holding that the Town’s monetary exaction was not roughly proportional because the rationale for it was too abstract and because the town provided no real evidence of impact
• noting that there is no practical difference between conditional approval and denial for want of a condition
• holding inverse-condemnation claim under article 1, section 17 of Texas Constitution provided just compensation for taking and therefore precluded federal just-compensation claim using section 1983
• noting that there is no practical difference between conditional approval and denial for want of a condition
• noting that there is no practical difference between A approval on condition and denial for want of the condition @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).