Town of Fairbanks v. Drayton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “absent DOE performance the need to spend substantial sums for additional at-reaetor storage was reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting”
• concluding that “absent DOE performance the need to spend substantial sums for additional at-reactor storage was reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting”
• stating that the disposal of SNF poses a “severe potential health hazard” with “complex technical problems”
• stating that the disposal of SNF poses a “severe potential health hazard” with “complex technical problems”
• “Having heard the evidence over a seven-week trial, and upon due consideration, the court concludes that exchanges would have occurred in the nonbreach world.”
• noting that “Congress recognized that SNF was a national health and safety concern, that the disposal of nuclear waste was a federal responsibility” in passing the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, under which the Standard Contract was developed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).