Town of Eureka v. Office of the State Engineer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it appropriate to waive application of a forfeiture statute where the holder of water rights resumed use after the statutory period of non-use
• holding it appropriate to waive application of a forfeiture statute where the holder of water rights resumed use after the statutory period of non-use
• noting that the State Engineer's interpretation of his authority may be persuasive but is not controlling and \the reviewing court may undertake independent review\ of questions of statutory construction
• \Water rights are subject to regulation under the police power as is necessary for the general welfare.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).