Town of Charlotte v. Richmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that party could not later raise nonconforming use defense because they did not appeal zoning administrator’s notice of violation
• noting that standing cannot be waived and may be asserted at any stage of litigation
• stating that “[t]he Court has strictly enforced the exclusivity-of-remedy provision,” and noting: “in the absence of an appeal, all parties are bound by local zoning decisions”
• “Having failed to appeal the determination by Charlotte's zoning administrator, defendants were bound by his decision.”
• noting questions relating to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time
• “24 V.S.A. § 4472 expressly deprives the superior court of subject matter jurisdiction when a timely appeal is not taken to the board of adjustment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).