Town of Cambridge v. Town of Underhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, despite rule of presumed change, we will not implement interpretation contrary to legislative intent where circumstances indicate clarification
• interpreting a statutory revision in 1947 and holding that no substantive change was intended
• interpreting a statutory revision in 1947 and holding that no substantive change was intended
• “Clarification is a legitimate objective of legislative action. If the circumstances clearly indicate clarification to be intended,” we enforce that intent
• “When changes ... come about only as a result of a revision, caution is required in determining whether or not any substantive change in the law was intended.”
• “When changes . . . come about only as a result of a revision, caution is required in determining whether or not any substantive change in the law was intended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).