Town of Bridport v. Sterling Clark Lurton Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “one factor in determining the adequacy of a warning is its conspicuousness on a label”
• deciding that the inadequacy of a warning that the plaintiff did not read could be the proximate cause of the plaintiffs injury if the warning was inadequate in its ability “to draw the attention of a reasonably prudent person”
• to succeed on failure-to-warn claim, plaintiff must show that “failure to warn made the product unreasonably dangerous and therefore defective”
• to succeed on failure-to-warn claim, plaintiff must show that \failure to warn made the product unreasonably dangerous and therefore defective\
• to succeed on failure-to-warn claim, plaintiff must show that \failure to warn made the product unreasonably dangerous and therefore defective\
• “where a warning has been provided by a manufacturer, ordinarily the sufficiency of that warning is a question for the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).