Skip to main content
· 7/28/1987

Town & Country Estates Ass'n v. Slater

Citations

  • 740 P.2d 668
  • 227 Mont. 489
  • 44 State Rptr. 1257
  • 1987 Mont. LEXIS 946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a restrictive covenant requiring approval of building plans by homeowners’ association which failed to define standard of approval was too vague for enforcement
  • \harmony of external design\ too vague to be enforceable where development was a cacophony of styles
  • \harmony of external design\ too vague to be enforced where development was a cacophony of architectural styles
  • \harmony of external design\ too vague to be enforced where development was a cacophony of architectural styles
  • “Each purchaser in a restricted subdivision is both subjected to the burden and entitled to the benefit of a restrictive covenant.”
  • “Each [landowner] is both subjected to the burden and entitled to the benefit of a restrictive covenant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turnage, Gulbrandson, Harrison, Hunt, Mc-Donough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.