Skip to main content
· 2/19/1999

Towle v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

Citations

  • 94 Wash. App. 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that con- clusions of law are reviewed de novo
  • reviewing mixed questions of law and fact regarding proxi- mate cause
  • “[I]f the district court’s findings are plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety, the appellate court cannot reverse even if it is convinced it would have found differently.”
  • “That trial judges in American Samoa tend to award lesser sums than those in Texas or California no more suggests that awards in Samoa should be higher than that those in Texas should be lower.”
  • internal quotes and cites omitted; 2 emphasis added throughout unless otherwise indicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.