Towers v. Wu (In Re Wu)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that commissions debtor insurance agent received on post-petition policy renewals were property of estate only to the extent the debtor's post-petition services were not a prerequisite to payment
• holding that earnings attributable to invested capital, goodwill, accounts receivable, employee contracts and client relationships predating the petition are the property of the estate, not property of the debtor
• finding that renewal commissions attributable to pre-petition services are part of the estate when paid post-petition
• finding that renewal commissions attrib- utable to pre-petition services are part of the estate when paid post- petition
• commissions debtor insurance agent received on post-petition policy renewals were property of estate only to the extent the debtor’s post-petition services were a not a prerequisite to payment
• rejecting explicitly Sloan’s “all or nothing” approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).