Towers v. Boyd (In Re Boyd)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[F]or the purposes of filing amendments, there is no difference between an open case and a reopened case, and [a debtor in a reopened case does] not need the court’s permission to amend.”
• discussing and rejecting equitable tolling concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).