Skip to main content
· 12/21/1905

Tower v. Compton Hill Improvement Co.

Citations

  • 192 Mo. 379
  • 91 S.W. 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The proof of malice need not be direct. It may be inferred by the jury, from the want of probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brace, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.