Texas Supreme Court· 5/15/1957
Tower Contracting Company v. Flores
Citations
- 302 S.W.2d 396
- 157 Tex. 297
- 1957 Tex. LEXIS 567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- except in cases where specific performance is proper, non-repudiating party “cannot afterwards go on, and thereby increase the damages, and then recover such damages from the other party”
- “the proper measure of damages, where the contractor sues on the contract, is … the contract value of the work actually done plus any profit the contractor would have made had he been permitted to complete the performance of his contract”
- contractual meaning not derived from piecemeal portions of contract
- contractual meaning not derived from piecemeal portions of contract
- contractual meaning not derived from piecemeal portions of contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norvell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 165×
- Krishnan v. SepulvedaTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 125×
- Tempo Tamers, Inc. v. Crow-Houston Four, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-05-05· cited 69×
- Stahl Petroleum Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-04-06· cited 48×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. GillmanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-16· cited 42×
- Berryman's South Fork, Inc. and Richard Berryman v. J. Baxter Brinkmann Internationial CorporationTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-11-20· cited 40×
- Creative Thinking Sources, Inc. v. Creative Thinking, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-05-02· cited 39×
- Sepulveda v. KrishnanTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-10-15· cited 36×
- Coon v. SchoenemanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1972-01-21· cited 34×
- Kleiner v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-06-13· cited 30×
- Kirkwood & Morgan, Inc. v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-07-11· cited 28×
- Meadows & Walker Drilling Company v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyFifth Circuit· 1969-10-10· cited 27×
- Delhi Pipeline Corporation v. Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1966-04-28· cited 27×
- Piper, Stiles & Ladd v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Md.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-21· cited 25×
- County Management, Inc. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-30· cited 24×
- Roberts v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-09-29· cited 23×
- Skyland Developers, Inc. v. Sky Harbor AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-31· cited 19×
- Robbins v. HNG Oil Co.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1994-06-23· cited 18×
- Texas West Oil & Gas Corp. v. El Paso Gas Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-20· cited 16×
- Wilfin, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-16· cited 16×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court· 1951-10-31· cited 553×
- Waples-Platter Co. v. Commercial Standard InsuranceTexas Supreme Court· 1956-10-03· cited 51×
- Tower Contracting Company v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-10-04· cited 20×
- Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.Fourth Circuit· 1929-10-15· cited 16×
- Hamill v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1954-12-27· cited 2×
Other cases named Tower Contracting Company v. Flores
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.