tovey services v. dept health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert testimony, based on the statements of the alleged victim, that the crime at issue had occurred was inadmissible because such testimony amounted to mere vouching for the alleged victim’s credibility
• holding that expert’s testimony was inadmissible when she testified that two girls were sexually assaulted, because they told her that they were assaulted
• holding that the parallel Federal Rule of Evidence 414 is not facially unconstitutional because the trial court must conduct a Rule 403 balancing test first
• holding that evidence of conduct “within a few weeks of” the charged date is sufficient to support a conviction
• noting that “on or about” language in indictment allows for offense to be committed within a few weeks of the specified date
• noting that the district court applied the guidelines in sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).