Toupin v. Laverdiere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party has \a cognizable action to seek the return of his money even though the overpayment might have been the product of his own negligence\
• \A person who has conferred a benefit upon another by mistake is not precluded from maintaining an action for restitution by the fact that the mistake was due to his lack of care.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).