TouchPoint Solutions, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that software developer met this prong where defendant customer had explicitly agreed that all information concerning system was to be confidential and developer had repeatedly made oral assertions of confidentiality
• recognizing that “a court is not required to sift through technical data to distill out a trade secret, but rather that the plaintiff must be clear about what information is protectable”
• recognizing that, “once the trade secret is lost, it is gone forever”
• noting that this presumption “is in recognition of the fact that, once the trade secret is lost, it is gone forever”
• setting forth factors that must be established in order to merit a preliminary injunction, and describing “a likelihood of success on the merits” as the “most important” factor
• “[t]he loss of a trade secret is generally found to constitute irreparable harm. That is in recognition of the fact that, ‘once the trade secret is lost, it is gone forever’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).