Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine precluded court from exercising subject matter jurisdiction in case that “effectively [sought] to collaterally attack the state court possession judgment ratifying the foreclosure and sale”
• applying Rooker - Feldman doctrine where plaintiff \effectively s[ought] to collaterally attack the state court possession judgment ratifying the foreclosure and sale of ... property.\
• applying Rooker-Feldman doctrine where plaintiff “effectively s[ought] to collaterally attack the state court possession judgment ratifying the foreclosure and sale of . . . property.”
• dismissing case brought by “plaintiff [who] effectively seeks to collaterally attack the state 20 court possession judgment ratifying the foreclosure and sale of the Michigan property (and permitting eviction proceedings)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).