Tosti v. Ayik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defamation plaintiff may recover damages for mental suffering and loss of employment
• placing significance on the absence of any evidence of medical or psychiatric treatment
• placing significance on the absence of any evidence of medical or psychiatric treatment
• applying directed verdict standard to defamation case requiring clear and convincing proof of malice
• “In order to determine the defendant’s state of mind, the jury are entitled to draw inferences from the objective evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).