Toshiba Glob. Com. Sols., Inc. v. Smart & Final Stores LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 9(b) applied to the plaintiff’s claim because the claim was “based on allegations that [the plaintiff] relied on [the defendant’s] intentional misrepresentations to his own detriment”
• finding that Rule 9(b) applied to the plaintiff’s Arizona Consumer Fraud Act claim because the claim was “based on allegations that [the plaintiff] relied on [the defendant’s] intentional misrepresentations to his own detriment” (emphasis added)
• applying Rule 9(b) to a claim asserted under the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act
• “a plaintiff needs to plead the who, what, when, where, and how regarding a claim only when Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard applies”
• “A party who fails to squarely raise a claim in its brief … abandons that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).