· 6/6/1988
Tosco Corp. v. Tuggle (In Re Tuggle)
Citations
- 86 B.R. 612
- 4 Bankr. Rep (St. Louis B.A.) 4188
- 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 797
- 1988 WL 56549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Accordingly, this Court adopts the position that delivery of an ultimately-dishonored check, without more does not constitute an actionable representation under § 523(a)(2)(A).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barry S. Schermer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.