Skip to main content
· 6/6/1988

Tosco Corp. v. Tuggle (In Re Tuggle)

Citations

  • 86 B.R. 612
  • 4 Bankr. Rep (St. Louis B.A.) 4188
  • 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 797
  • 1988 WL 56549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Accordingly, this Court adopts the position that delivery of an ultimately-dishonored check, without more does not constitute an actionable representation under § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry S. Schermer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.