Torstenson v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding physical contact 3 requirement unsatisfied when claimant’s van was hit by cargo carried by the unidentified 4 vehicle
• “van was hit not by an ‘integral part’ of the truck, but by cargo carried by the truck”
• metal object that flew from truck and struck windshield of van did not satisfy “actual physical contact” requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).