Torry Dewayne Bailey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that we may affirm on any grounds supported by the record even if different from the reasons of the district court
• holding that provision requiring employee to \work[] . . . for a minimum of 30 hours during a person's regular work week\ could \be reasonably interpreted to mean that a person's job description requires that person to work thirty hours a week\
• concluding that \'[a]ctive' could also mean non-retired\
• approving the use of the Economics of Law Practice of Michigan survey in determining a reasonable hourly rate
• affirming the viability of the King factors after the decision in Hardt
• “[This Court has held that a claimant is not required to exhaust her issues because of the non-adversarial nature of ERISA proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).