Torres v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s settlement price cannot 17 be “grossly disproportionate to that defendant’s fair share of the damages”
• holding that “a co-defendant’s settlement price 17 cannot be grossly disproportionate to his fair share of the damages”
• holding that “a co-defendant’s settlement price 3 cannot be grossly disproportionate to his fair share of the damages”
• no good faith where defendant settles by paying sum “grossly 16 disproportionate” to their fair share of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).