California Court of Appeal· 6/22/1984
Torres v. Union Pacific Railroad
Citations
- 157 Cal. App. 3d 499
- 203 Cal. Rptr. 825
- 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant’s settlement price cannot 17 be “grossly disproportionate to that defendant’s fair share of the damages”
- holding that “a co-defendant’s settlement price 17 cannot be grossly disproportionate to his fair share of the damages”
- holding that “a co-defendant’s settlement price 3 cannot be grossly disproportionate to his fair share of the damages”
- no good faith where defendant settles by paying sum “grossly 16 disproportionate” to their fair share of damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-05-02· cited 274×
- San Joaquin County Department of Human Services v. Gary L.California Court of Appeal· 1993-11-30· cited 218×
- Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-09-03· cited 108×
- Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-05-22· cited 96×
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. David L. ButlerNinth Circuit· 1990-05-31· cited 61×
- Gum v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-12-08· cited 44×
- City of Grand Terrace v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-06-23· cited 39×
- Singer Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-04-07· cited 33×
- Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. DavidsonNevada Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 29×
- Angelus Associates Corp. v. Neonex Leisure Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1985-04-29· cited 25×
- Greshko v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-08-18· cited 23×
- Standard Pacific of San Diego v. AA Baxter Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1986-01-13· cited 22×
- Barth-Wittmore Insurance v. H. R. Murphy Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1985-06-10· cited 19×
- Moreno v. SayreCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-11-28· cited 19×
- Shane v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-10-19· cited 18×
- IRM Corp. v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-26· cited 15×
- Southern California Gas Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-12-10· cited 13×
- Rankin v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-07-25· cited 12×
- Horton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-07-10· cited 9×
- BREHM COMMUNITIES v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-05-22· cited 8×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-02-09· cited 547×
- Owen v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1983-08-26· cited 108×
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-07-31· cited 98×
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyNinth Circuit· 1981-04-24· cited 70×
- Fisher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-03-14· cited 45×
- Dompeling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-04-08· cited 42×
- Kohn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-04-26· cited 30×
- Huizar v. Abex Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1984-05-29· cited 21×
- Lareau v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal· 1975-01-22· cited 17×
- Cardio Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-08-21· cited 15×
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-12-03· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.