Torres v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that presence at the scene of the offense alone is insufficient, but it is a circumstance tending to connect a person with a crime and taken with other facts, may be sufficient to show he was an actor in the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nethery v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 365×
• Kerns v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-03· cited 108×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-19· cited 55×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-16· cited 50×
• Barron v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-07· cited 33×
• Clay v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-03-06· cited 31×
• Nevarez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-16· cited 31×
• Lombardo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-16· cited 26×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-23· cited 23×
• Morgan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-16· cited 18×
• Curren v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-06-15· cited 14×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-06-04· cited 11×
• Paloma v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-20· cited 11×
• Kubosh v. City of Houston
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-11-04· cited 7×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-15· cited 3×
• Roberto Gonzales v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-07-11
• Terry Lynn Bell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-05-01
• Verdell Sutphen v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-01
• Gilmore, Kenneth Wayne v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-04-17