Torres v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] federal habeas petition is second or successive if the facts underlying 23 the claim occurred by the time of the initial petition, . . . and if the petition challenges the same state court judgment as the initial petition.”
• “It is now understood that a federal habeas petition is second 12 or successive if the facts underlying the claim occurred by the time of the initial petition, . . . and 13 if the petition challenges the same state court judgment as the initial petition. . . .”
• “It is now understood that a federal habeas petition is second 1 or successive if the facts underlying the claim occurred by the time of the initial petition, . . . and 2 if the petition challenges the same state court judgment as the initial petition. . . .”
• “It is now understood that a federal habeas petition 15 is second or successive if the facts underlying the claim occurred by the time of 16 the initial petition, . . . and if the petition challenges the same state court 17 judgment as the initial petition. . . .”
• “It is now understood that a federal habeas 12 petition is second or successive if the facts underlying the claim occurred by the time of the 13 initial petition, . . . and if the petition challenges the same state court judgment as the initial 14 petition. . . .”
• “It is now understood that a federal habeas 3 petition is second or successive if the facts underlying the claim occurred by the time of 4 the initial petition, . . . and if the petition challenges the same state court judgment as the 5 initial petition. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).