Skip to main content
· 4/4/2007

Torres v. Commonwealth of PR

Citations

  • 485 F.3d 5
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7685
  • 2007 WL 996302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court can deny a defendant’s dispositive motion, which asserts qualified immunity, if the defendants ignored the court’s trial management order
  • holding that a final order of removal is a prerequisite to the application of section 1252(a
  • noting that district court denied motion to stay because appeal was frivolous and defendant had engaged in delay tactics
  • noting that district court denied motion to stay because appeal was frivolous and defendant had engaged in delay tactics
  • “District courts have wide discretion to set reasonable deadlines for asserting such defenses, and they may impose condign sanctions on parties who do not comply.”
  • “[F]orce is only justified when there is a need for force.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.