E.D. Pennsylvania· 2/5/2015
Torres v. Cleannet, U.S.A., Inc.
Citations
- 90 F. Supp. 3d 369
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13722
- 2015 WL 500163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that \there is absolutely no rule that prevents arbitration when a person cannot effectively vindicate his or her state statutory rights.\
- distinguishing Booker because it pre-dated AT&T Mobility and Justice Kagan’s explanation of AT&T Mobility’s implication and holding that effective vindication doctrine does not apply where state statutes are concerned
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brody
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.