Skip to main content
· 9/1/2011

Torres-Tristan v. Holder

Citations

  • 656 F.3d 653
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18204
  • 2011 WL 3849636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to entertain challenge to underlying removal order in a petition for review of an order reinstating removal order
  • “Ancillary determinations made outside the context of a removal proceeding, however, are not subject to direct review.”
  • “Ancillary determinations made outside the context of a removal proceeding, however, are not subject to direct review.”
  • “A person who meets the statutory criteria is only eligible for … a [U]-visa, [and is] not entitled to one as a matter of right.”
  • “A person who meets the statutory criteria is only eligible for . . . a [U] visa, not entitled to one as a matter of right.”
  • “[J]udicial review in the circuit courts of appeals of U visa denials . . . would appear to be unprecedented. Our decisions reflect a longstanding practice of not reviewing visa denials in general”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Wood, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.