Torres-Santiago v. Díaz-Casiano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is best construed as alleging an official policy rather than a “random or unauthorized act”
• holding that plaintiff need only plausibly allege that a jury could determine that the comparators are similarly situated
• holding that the Fourteenth Amendment protects “right to free speech” as a liberty interest but that free speech “remains subject to reasonable government regulation
• concluding \harassment and intimidation by Defendants\ constituted an injury for a First Amendment retaliation claim
• dismissing the plaintiffs Equal Protection claim where, the amended complaint was “completely devoid of any reference to ‘similarly situated’ or ‘substantially similar’ individuals”
• dismissing equal protection claim where the amended complaint was “completely devoid of any reference to ‘similarly situated’ or ‘substantially similar’ individuals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).