Toronto State Bank v. Guy

Citations

• 106 Kan. 244
• 187 P. 865
• 1920 Kan. LEXIS 495

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Replevin — Chattel Mortgage — Evidence of Prior Chattel Mortgage Competent. The evidence examined, and it is held that a certain chattel mortgage was properly received as evidence as a part of the history of the dealings between the parties to the subsequent mortgage forming the basis of this action.</p> <p>2. Same — Chattel Mortgage — Recorded im, Proper County. The maker of a chattel mortgage executed in October, 1916, was shown to have lived during that fall in a county adjoining the one where the mortgaged property was located. Held, That the instrument was properly recordable in either county.</p> <p>8. Same — Evidence Sustains Judgment. The evidence fairly supports the conclusions reached by the trial court.</p> <p>4. Appeal — Error in Notice of Appeal — Waiver. The dates on which judgment was rendered and the motion for new trial overruled were not correctly stated in the notice of appeal, but it was served in time and, no motion to dismiss having been filed, it will be assumed that the dates named were incorrect by reason of a clerical error.</p>