Skip to main content
· 3/31/1992

Toro v. City of Norfolk

Citations

  • 416 S.E.2d 29
  • 14 Va. App. 244
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 2538
  • 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that unchallenged avowal by counsel of the expected testimony is a proper proffer if it demonstrates the relevance of the expected testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.