· 11/14/1975
Toro Petroleum Corp. v. Newell
Citations
- 338 N.E.2d 491
- 33 Ill. App. 3d 223
- 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 3715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the appellate court reversed the damage award and ordered the trial court to enter an increased award, interest accrued on the lesser award until it was reversed and then on the greater award from the date of the appellate court’s reversal
- where the amount of the judgment was increased on appeal, interest began to accrue on the original amount from the date of the original judgment and interest accrued on the increased amount from the date of the appellate court’s decision
- escrowee’s disbursement was a breach of its fiduciary duty where the escrow instructions permitted the escrowee to act only upon the joint written direction of the parties, but the disbursement order did not contain the signature of one of the parties
- escrowee’s disbursement was a breach of its fiduciary duty where the escrow instructions permitted the escrowee to act only upon the joint written direction of the parties, but the disbursement order did not contain the signature of one of the parties
- where the appellate court reversed the damage award and ordered the trial court to enter an increased award, interest accrued on the lesser award until it was reversed and then on the greater award from the date of the appellate court's reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.