Skip to main content
· 11/14/1975

Toro Petroleum Corp. v. Newell

Citations

  • 338 N.E.2d 491
  • 33 Ill. App. 3d 223
  • 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 3715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the appellate court reversed the damage award and ordered the trial court to enter an increased award, interest accrued on the lesser award until it was reversed and then on the greater award from the date of the appellate court’s reversal
  • where the amount of the judgment was increased on appeal, interest began to accrue on the original amount from the date of the original judgment and interest accrued on the increased amount from the date of the appellate court’s decision
  • escrowee’s disbursement was a breach of its fiduciary duty where the escrow instructions permitted the escrowee to act only upon the joint written direction of the parties, but the disbursement order did not contain the signature of one of the parties
  • escrowee’s disbursement was a breach of its fiduciary duty where the escrow instructions permitted the escrowee to act only upon the joint written direction of the parties, but the disbursement order did not contain the signature of one of the parties
  • where the appellate court reversed the damage award and ordered the trial court to enter an increased award, interest accrued on the lesser award until it was reversed and then on the greater award from the date of the appellate court's reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.