Torgerson v. Goodwill Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant's attendance of AA meetings was expressly found to be necessary to control his alcoholism, thus justifying a denial of benefits when he failed to do so
• claimant's attendance of AA meetings was expressly found to be necessary to control his alcoholism, thus justifying a denial of benefits when he failed to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Henson v. Employment Security Department
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 19×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-02-23· cited 172×
• Jacobs v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-05-31· cited 43×
• Moeller v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-27· cited 34×
• Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion Project
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-01-25· cited 32×
• Mooney v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-26· cited 19×