Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties seeking a protective order on the ground that the discovery requested would be unduly burdensome bear the burden of presenting evidence in the trial court to support that position
• dismissing certiorari petition and holding that trial court did not err in overruling objection to production of documents as constituting undue burden where objection was not supported by record evidence
• “It seems clear to us that the mere fact of unwarranted effort and expense is not, by itself, synonymous with a ‘departure from the essential requirements of law1 [e.s.] for which immediate review is necessary.”
• “It seems clear to us that the mere fact of unwarranted effort and expense is not, by itself, synonymous with a ‘departure from the essential requirements of law’ [e.s.] for which immediate review is necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).