Topp, Inc. v. Uniden American Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no oral agreement existed where subsequent written contract covered same subject matter and stated that it terminated all other agreements between the parties
• “The Court assumes that because Topp’s operations are centered in Florida, the place where it performed these acts in reliance was in Florida.”
• “It appears to the Court that with all of the operations and personnel Topp has in Florida, that majority of the injury necessarily occurred in Florida.”
• “Oral agreements of the type alleged by [the plaintiff] are barred by the Statute of Frauds in the absence of a writing which is sufficient to evidence the existence of an agreement.” (alteration and emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).