· 4/18/2005
Topeka Housing Authurity v. Johnson
Citations
- 404 F.3d 1245
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6537
- 2005 WL 880650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that complete preemption is an exception to the general rule barring removal based on counterclaims
- noting that complete preemption is an exception to the general rule barring removal based on counterclaims
- noting that complete preemption is an excep- tion to the general rule barring removal based on counterclaims
- enforcing bar where, as here, district court remanded case for lack of valid jurisdictional basis for removal
- stating the party seeking disqualification bears a “heavy burden of showing the requisite judicial bias or misconduct”
- “When the federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over a removed case, the court must remand the case to the state court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Hartz, McConnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.