Skip to main content
· 4/18/2005

Topeka Housing Authurity v. Johnson

Citations

  • 404 F.3d 1245
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6537
  • 2005 WL 880650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that complete preemption is an exception to the general rule barring removal based on counterclaims
  • noting that complete preemption is an exception to the general rule barring removal based on counterclaims
  • noting that complete preemption is an excep- tion to the general rule barring removal based on counterclaims
  • enforcing bar where, as here, district court remanded case for lack of valid jurisdictional basis for removal
  • stating the party seeking disqualification bears a “heavy burden of showing the requisite judicial bias or misconduct”
  • “When the federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over a removed case, the court must remand the case to the state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Hartz, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.