· 11/2/1987
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' International Union
Citations
- 832 F.2d 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to look to the “law of the shop” when the dispositive contractual provision was unambiguous
- vacating award when arbitrator relied on outside policy in reinstating grievant despite unambiguous language in last-chance agreement that she would be terminated for any absence
- vacating arbitrator’s decision that second absence, excusable under company’s general attendance policy, did not violate LCA’s ban on more than one absence per month “for any reason”
- vacating arbitration award where arbitrator “failed to follow the clear requirements of the agreement”
- vacating arbitration award where arbitrator “failed to follow the clear requirements of the agreement”
- treating last chance agreement as if it were a collective bargaining agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Manion, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.