Skip to main content
· 11/2/1987

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' International Union

Citations

  • 832 F.2d 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to look to the “law of the shop” when the dispositive contractual provision was unambiguous
  • vacating award when arbitrator relied on outside policy in reinstating grievant despite unambiguous language in last-chance agreement that she would be terminated for any absence
  • vacating arbitrator’s decision that second absence, excusable under company’s general attendance policy, did not violate LCA’s ban on more than one absence per month “for any reason”
  • vacating arbitration award where arbitrator “failed to follow the clear requirements of the agreement”
  • vacating arbitration award where arbitrator “failed to follow the clear requirements of the agreement”
  • treating last chance agreement as if it were a collective bargaining agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Manion, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.