Tooley v. Alm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to hold that mandamus is never available to compel the Bureau to perform an act that the law specifically requires it to perform
• declining to hold that mandamus is never available to compel the Bureau to perform an act that the law specifically requires it to perform
• affirming dismissal of mandamus action, because the claimant’s right to appeal Workers’ Compensation Bureau decision was an adequate legal remedy, which had not been exhausted, and claimant had not shown a clear legal right to have the Bureau perform certain acts
• affirming dismissal of mandamus action, because the claimant's right to appeal Workers' Compensation Bureau decision was an adequate legal remedy, which had not been exhausted, and claimant had not shown a clear legal right to have the Bureau perform certain acts
• Workers’ Compensation Bureau has no duty to inform claimant of availability of benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).