Toohey v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp. Health & Welfare Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the hospital established the residents’ supplemental disability plan because (a) multiple resident doctors purchased policies under the plan, and (b
• “Because the Court has determined that the Safe Harbor Provision does not apply to the instant dispute, the Court must continue its analysis ‘under the conventional tests.’ ”
• “If the Court determined that each of the Safe Harbor criteria are satisfied here, then the Court would necessarily conclude that... the [employer] did not establish or maintain the [disability policy at issue.]”
• deeming facts admitted where plaintiff failed to meaningfully dispute them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).