Tony Velasquez v. Arthur A. Leonardo, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state court’s finding that petitioner’s “claims were not preserved for appellate review” under N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.05(2
• holding that a state court’s finding that petitioner’s “claims were not preserved for appellate review” under N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.05(2
• holding that a state court’s finding that petitioner’s “claims were not preserved for appellate review” under N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.05(2
• holding that state court’s reliance on contemporaneous objection rule was as an independent and adequate state ground which barred habeas review of claims of prosecutorial misconduct
• holding violation of New York’s contemporaneous objection rule is an independent and adequate state ground in failing to preserve a claim that the prosecutor made improper comments during his opening statement and in summation
• violation of New York’s contemporaneous objection rule is an adequate and independent state ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).