Skip to main content
· 3/25/2002

Tony Brummett v. Lee Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Decatur Herald and Review

Citations

  • 284 F.3d 742
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,044
  • 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 609
  • 2002 WL 449698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Mr. Brummett’s claim against his previous employer could not satisfy the pretext prong of (continued...
  • affirming summary judgment and noting that employers are “under no obligation to bend over backwards to assist its employees with their job-related difficulties, especially difficulties caused by their own wrongdoing”
  • employee legitimately 83 Plaintiffs allege Lisath or Williams told Hernández that Rosado had been discharged for “insubordination” (Docket No. 73, p. 3
  • “It is not enough that [Plaintiff] is African American, was disliked, and was fired; he must prevent some evidence…that he was fired because of his race.”
  • “[W]e will not second-guess an employer’s policies that are facially legitimate.”
  • where an employer required \a valid driver's license and a good driving record\ for business reasons, and the plaintiff's driver's license had been suspended for bad driving, the plaintiff could not show that he was meeting his employer's legitimate expectations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.